Search for: "Matter of Brown" Results 6041 - 6060 of 9,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 5:44 am by admin
Buzak on behalf of NJLM Evidently the courts didn’t major in urban planning either – or, for that matter, affordable housing. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:46 pm by Chad Flanders
  One needs only to read the Supreme Court’s description of prison conditions in Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:08 am by pfriedman
Buchanan was heard as a title-mangling disc jockey (allegedly based on Alan Freed), who interrupted a Nappy Brown dance number with news of an invasion from Mars. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
Ferrill of Brown, Pruitt, Peterson & Wambsganss, P.C. in Fort Worth, Texas. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
Inevitably, the threat of potential judicial examination of these matters, and particularly the threat of personal liability, would affect all future executive deliberations. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:30 pm by Staci Zaretsky
” He also said search-and-seizure, consent search and arrest matters would draw defense scrutiny. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
What you may find in a brown envelope MMI v Cellxion shows that it is not strictly necessary to find a point of principle in order to appeal on the question of obviousness. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:49 pm by Adam Gillette
He was 104 and still hearing matters in 2011. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Furthermore, Justice Scalia wrote for the Court in the "violent video games" case of Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The gold and brown go together better than the mustard and brown of the San Diego Padres from the same era. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by David Lat
In 2001, I became a partner in Brown, Rountree & Stewart PC, in Statesboro, Georgia. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm by James Hamilton
” According to Judges Rogers, Garland and Brown, “Initial review occurs at the appellate level only when a direct-review statute specifically gives the court of appeals subject-matter jurisdiction to directly review agency action …There is no express congressional authorization of direct appellate review applicable to the petition for review in this case. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]