Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 16,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
The post Wedding cakes v. religious beliefs? [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 3:42 am
In Collier v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 8:46 am
Hurst v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 5:19 am
” The closest the law comes to authorizing a federal agency that they have any business in college students’ pants is Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
– R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
The case is entitled State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
And that was the principle reason for my granting of the pardon,” he told Representative Elizabeth Holtzman. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
The Kansas case of Servi-Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
So what if courts usurp authorities constitutionally granted to other branches of government? [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg examines the petitioner’s free-speech arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And those two things – asking people to believe something they can see isn’t true, and stretching the law beyond what it can reasonably incorporate to justify an end the Court wants to achieve – are troubling precedents for the functioning of the law and our legal system. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:04 pm
In 2016’s U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:06 am
But the case the Times cites, Missouri v. [read post]
