Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 6041 - 6060 of 39,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in considering those claims, the fact that the companies are for-profit enterprises, or corporations, may well be relevant, whether or not they are determinative threshold considerations. 5. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
Yes, you may have violated the law, consistently, and damaged an institution or otherwise harmed people. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am by SHG
Roosevelt may have had the right idea for the wrong reason.Oh, spare me the bullshit. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Adam Liptak reports for the NYT that the issue of standing may pop up in this case.Standing is an issue in two of CJLF's current cases, HCRC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:34 pm
County Court, Sullivan County New York: People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm by Adam Wagner
In Frodl v Austria the Court said that any restriction on voting rights must be proportionate to the end pursued, and “must reflect, or not run counter to, the concern to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of an electoral procedure aimed at identifying the will of the people through universal suffrage. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:26 pm by Donald Thompson
The Court noted that although defendant’s guilty plea forfeited his claim that his statutory right to testify under CPL § 190.50 was violated, the “claimed deprivation of the [s]tate constitutional right to counsel may be raised on appeal, notwithstanding that the issue was not preserved” before the lower court (citing People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772, 773 [1983]). [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightWilliams v. [read post]