Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6041 - 6060 of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 11:28 am
Section 240 imposes strict liability on contractors. owners, and their agents; should the defendant be found in violation of the statute, no contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff can mitigate the defendant's responsibility. [read post]
Related Posts: Court Upholds Jury’s Zero-Dollar Verdict in Personal Injury Case, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, March 9, 2016 Recent Appellate Court Opinion Finds in Favor of Plaintiff in Road Rage Case, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, April 1, 2016 [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
The Federal Circuit has since affirmed the Court’s construction of one of the terms identified in Plaintiffs’ motion and the Court is not inclined to revisit any of its constructions at this time. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Plaintiffs sued the shooter, the shooter's father, and the father's gun store business.The Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint with myriad allegations of liability. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm
The photographs do not show Defendant D’s initials and the witness testified that another complaint was made, just six days before plaintiff's accident, for gas access at the same location, but provided no record of the actual work performed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:36 pm
"In Health Law Case, Plaintiffs Dislike Rules on Purchases and Penalties": In Wednesday's edition of The New York Times, Robert Pear will have an article that begins, "People sometimes wonder why David M. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:27 pm
"Bishop Zubik lead plaintiff in Obamacare challenge in Supreme Court": Tracie Mauriello has this front page article in today's edition of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Townsend, No. 08-214 In an action based on Defendant’s alleged refusal to pay maintenance and cure to Plaintiff for injuries he suffered while working on Defendant’s tugboat, the District Court’s order holding that punitive damages were available is affirmed where punitive damages for the [...] [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:08 pm
Furthermore, plaintiff's attorney's affirmation is not admissible probative evidence on medical issues, as plaintiff's attorney has failed to demonstrate personal knowledge of the plaintiff's injuries. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
 The plaintiff argued, on motion to remand, that the amount in controversy failed to satisfy CAFA’s jurisdictional minimum of $5,000,000. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
March 27, 2008)*: In this case, instead of impounding (or otherwise taking custody of) the Plaintiff's car, the police took items out of his car, purportedly pursuant to their community caretaking responsibilities. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
(August 23, 2010), that because Plaintiff's primary duties as Store Manager were managerial in nature, Defendant properly classified Plaintiff as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). [read post]
23 May 2016, 4:48 pm by Amy Howe
  More broadly, the Court’s ruling is decisively a plaintiff-friendly one. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
 The decision emphasizes that a corporate parent’s liability for the actions of its subsidiary is the exception, and not the general rule, and it is a plaintiffs obligation to plead facts in support of any exception to the general rule that it intends to rely upon. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:08 pm by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
Ultimately, the court concluded that the evidence presented indicated that the plaintiff was more than 50% at fault for his injuries, and thus dismissal of the plaintiffs case under the Comparative Fault Act was appropriate. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:35 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
More recently, the Court of Appeals considered the question of a plaintiffs contributory negligence in a case in which he was unable to communicate his account of the underlying accident. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:35 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
More recently, the Court of Appeals considered the question of a plaintiffs contributory negligence in a case in which he was unable to communicate his account of the underlying accident. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
" A reasonable jury could take these statements to reflect a discriminatory attitude, biased against older workers, by those who participated in the plaintiff's termination. [read post]