Search for: "Robert Thomas"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 10,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas joined the majority opinion. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor have not read any, while in the past ten Terms Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Kagan have read only one each. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Here is the case in a nutshell, taken from the majority opinion written by Justice Alito (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas): In this case, we decide a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
” Steve Vladeck of LawFare praises Justice Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Lanus v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority – which included Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy – in holding that section 4 was unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Justice Roberts authored the dissent, joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Jan. 9, 2013) (per Roberts, for unanimous Court; Kennedy concurred, and Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor joined him). [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:25 am
In 3 separate cases, the majority of Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito fended off Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
The majority (Alito, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas and Breyer, whose concurrence is more limited) read the law as concerned primarily with involuntary termination proceedings in which state social workers come into Indian families and remove children. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
For all of these conclusions, Thomas relies extremely heavily on Robert Natelson's Original Understanding of the Indian Commerce Clause, (and a little on Sai Prakash) although I can't tell for sure if Thomas's conclusions perfectly match theirs. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:21 pm
Justice Thomas would go further. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
The majority opinion (Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) held that the St. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
The majority opinion (Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) held that the St. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:28 am
In an opinion by Justice Robert R. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:09 am
In 1976, Thomas was convicted of murdering Robert Groothuis, a gas station owner. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Justice Robert R. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Of the four dissenters (Robert, Scalia, Thomas and Alito), all found Section 3 to be constitutional and all but Alito found that BLAG lacked standing to defend the action. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
The dissent arguing in favor of standing was written by Justice Kennedy, and joined by Justices Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Perhaps the varied views of the right-wing--a dissent by Chief Justice Roberts, a dissent by Justice Scalia in which Justice Thomas joined (and Roberts in Part I), and a dissent by Alito in which Justice Thomas joined in Parts II and III--augers well for a graduate withering away of the "traditionalist" (reaqd-- religious fundamentalist) views incorporated in those opinions. [read post]
