Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
By Eric Goldman Intellect Art Multimedia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
The case, State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:35 pm
. 'My cat just rolled over' was not the makings of client development as I saw it. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
While whatever crime was going on in the street, the defendant claimed that he was upstairs, down the block, gambling in a whorehouse. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
(various citations and case-specific dates omitted).That started the ball rolling - at least for us.Not every New Jersey district court judge agreed with Thompson. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
Sween Company, Serial No. 77048091 [refusal to register DELI EXPRESS SAN LUIS in standard character form for "burritos; snack cakes; and snack rolls, namely, sweet rolls" on the ground that the drawing does not match the specimen].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court has decided to take up the case of Berghuis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
Malcolm v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:30 am
;Ross Pifer, Director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at The Penn State Dickinson School of Law;Michael Roberts, Senior Counsel, International Affairs, Roll International CorporationRusty Rumley, Staff Attorney, National Agricultural Law Center.Our visiting faculty were also prominent participants in the conference, with Neil Hamilton, Professor, Drake University Law School and Director of the Drake Agricultural Law Center and David Grahn, Office of General Counsel,… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:46 am
A recent take on this comes in Russo v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:15 am
Recently, the South Dakota Supreme Court in Russo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
Dever v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm
Just finished Patrick Hindert's homage to himself on S2KM's Beyond Structured Settlements blog. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:38 am
Rept. 110-857. 9/23/2008: H.R. 5244 is passed by the House: 312-112 (Roll no. 623). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
The relevant case is Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:54 pm
Should defendants simply roll over? [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
And the result isn't surprising after the SCOTUS opinion in District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC upholds patentability of drug dosage method claim: Prometheus v Mayo (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (Patents4Life) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) (Patent Docs) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Mircera (Recombinant erythropoietin) – US: CAFC: Section 121 ‘safe harbor’ provision does not apply to… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:59 pm
(A defendant has consented to have his case details made available, though he does not want to be personally identified.)In State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
Coyote, Plaintiff v. [read post]
