Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 14,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-7120; recall that last Friday, the Court restored Johnson, which was argued in November, to the April calendar for reargument on the issue of “[w]hether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act [] is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm by Michael Erdman
At the very end of 2009, the Fourth Circuit ruled in Nemet Chevrolet v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
The class action world is abuzz with discussion of Judge Posner’s recent opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Butler v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:43 am by John Elwood
The brief, which was filed by Wachtell’s George Conway of Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by David Lat
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:08 am by Kurt J. Schafers
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), the Supreme Court stated that “[w]e now hold that §§ 10 and 11 respectively provide the FAA’s exclusive grounds for expedited vacatur and modification. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by David M. McLain
  In response, the Court of Appeals stated that Allstate’s interpretation of the statutes was strained and unreasonable. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow: Margaret… [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am by Charles Kotuby
’” This is especially troubling in the minds of the dissenting Justices because “[w]hen the drafters wanted to refer to country, they did; indeed, the phrase “State of habitual residence” appears no fewer than four other times elsewhere within the Convention’s text. [read post]