Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 6041 - 6060 of 6,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 8:46 pm by CoL .net
Papers and abstracts in English, Portuguese or Spanish are accepted and may be submitted in line with one of the thematic sessions of the Workshop to the e-mail: 4workshop.dipr.pucrio2023@gmail.com. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:58 am by Broc Romanek
Don’t forget to check out our “Family Feud” Keynote Session as two families of top lawyers & consultants – “50 Shades of Clawbacks” v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am by SHG
  The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:26 pm by Shea Denning
This bill undoes the district court notice and demand procedures enacted by the General Assembly following the Supreme Court’s opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
The Agricultural Credit Act of 2009 would reauthorize state agricultural mediation programs under title V of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
  Our Chief Justice was making (v. earning) $107,600 per annum and will now be paid $128,556. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:12 am
”   That, of course,  is the same day the Supreme Court returns to work after its summer recess, some four months after its ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by SHG
This will now change, due to the new bail law rushed through the state lege. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:27 am by Brian A. Comer
“We don’t believe in caps of any kind, but what was passed in this bill is reasonable compared to other states. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
And while he remarked that the posted photos indicated that he did not receive therapy for a week, he also acknowledged that he had never missed any therapy sessions. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the record overwhelmingly confirmed his wrongdoing and that the school district suffered prejudice, a federal court in Pennsylvania precluded him from using the documents, ordered him to return them, and stated that it would determine before trial whether to impose any additional sanctions for his misconduct and false testimony (Spencer v. [read post]
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:56 pm
Shibban Lal Saksena wanted, among other things, the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner as well as of the Election Commissioners to be confirmed by two-third majority in a joint session of both Houses of Parliament. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
The board required the employee to attend three sessions with a psychologist it chose; he was cleared to return July 28. [read post]