Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! " Results 6041 - 6060 of 9,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
That precedent came up when DOMA’s ban on federal benefits for legally married same-sex couples was challenged by seven couples who had been married in Massachusetts and three surviving spouses of such marriage. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Eric
Abandoning a trademark doesn’t divest the trademark owner of ACPA standing for past statutory damages. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:06 am by jbyrne
”  The California State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility, in its opinion 10-00001, has stated that social media posts which could be construed as advertising (ie. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  3Hanger used the article “to promote its own business at the expense of United's standing and reputation with customers. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:26 am by Ed Wallis
The Mirena Intra-Uterine System (IUS) is designed to be placed within seven (7) days of the first menstruation and approved to remain in the uterus for up to five (5) years. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:15 am by SHG
  And when they love and interest dissipates, and the fighting grows tedious and sucks up time from more remunerative ventures, will Charles Carreon be the only one left standing? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:53 am by mrlibrarian
  Nope, you need to stand up for your rights, go to your local county law library, talk to your friendly neighborhood law librarian because if you don't do it, no one else will do it for you (for free). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The courts with the highest filing levels after the Southern District of New York were the Central District of California (6); and the Northern District of California, Northern District of Illinois and District of Massachusetts, each of which had five filings. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm by Ken
IndieGoGo — unlike Charlie the Censor — engages in a thoughtful and persuasive discussion of pertinent authorities on California charity law, and establishes rather convincingly that he lacks standing to sue. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm by Ken
IndieGoGo — unlike Charlie the Censor — engages in a thoughtful and persuasive discussion of pertinent authorities on California charity law, and establishes rather convincingly that he lacks standing to sue. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm by Hani Sarji
Regarding the first allegation, the trial court stated that it was up to the appellate court to recognize a new tort for IIEI. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:01 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  But compared to a lot of other resources, it does not necessarily stand out. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
In a copyright case, it is usually the plaintiff—who owns the copyright and thus has standing to bring the lawsuit—who is claiming harm.....Plaintiffs do not allege how they as corporations based in Korea suffered any harm in California. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am by Sean Dugan
The government should not go about setting up a “Ministry of Truth”. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  For that matter, it probably didn’t matter whether that Little Caesar’s got its tomato sauce from a farm in California or one south of Columbus, Ohio. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
California's Stockton Record carries the editorial, "Mandatory sentences unjust. [read post]