Search for: "Session v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
  Our Chief Justice was making (v. earning) $107,600 per annum and will now be paid $128,556. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:12 am
”   That, of course,  is the same day the Supreme Court returns to work after its summer recess, some four months after its ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by SHG
This will now change, due to the new bail law rushed through the state lege. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:27 am by Brian A. Comer
“We don’t believe in caps of any kind, but what was passed in this bill is reasonable compared to other states. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
And while he remarked that the posted photos indicated that he did not receive therapy for a week, he also acknowledged that he had never missed any therapy sessions. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the record overwhelmingly confirmed his wrongdoing and that the school district suffered prejudice, a federal court in Pennsylvania precluded him from using the documents, ordered him to return them, and stated that it would determine before trial whether to impose any additional sanctions for his misconduct and false testimony (Spencer v. [read post]
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:56 pm
Shibban Lal Saksena wanted, among other things, the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner as well as of the Election Commissioners to be confirmed by two-third majority in a joint session of both Houses of Parliament. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
The board required the employee to attend three sessions with a psychologist it chose; he was cleared to return July 28. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:26 am by Gideon
This most recent iteration, which can be viewed on a screen near you, is also known by its working title of State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:13 pm by Joe Markowitz
Two questions were decided by the panel in the Winklevoss v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
An approved State claims act would allow the State to retain an additional 10% share of recoveries. [read post]