Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 11,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Jerry & Linda Smith, et al., a 12-page opinion, Judge Bradford writes:Appellants-Plaintiffs Jerry Pardue and Linda Pardue (collectively, "the Pardues") appeal the trial court's judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of Jerry Smith and Linda Smith (collectively, "the Smiths"), Stephen M. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia, Perry v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
In its decision in 303 Creative, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) ruled that artist Lorie Smith had to create websites for same-sex marriage despite her religious objections to such unions. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:39 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
Smith, 250 F.3d 1073, 1077 (7th Cir. 2001) (Wood, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:20 am by Howard Friedman
Smith and the Rebirth of State Constitutional Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:59 pm
Smith, No. 06-4885 (4th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Richard Mumford
Thus, Dr Mattu’s position, as a registered consultant, was distinguished from the position of the trainee doctor in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust [2009] ICR 101, who could not complete his training in the private sector and whose dismissal would (in the obiter view of Smith LJ) have engaged Article 6 and its safeguards. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]