Search for: "State v. Browning" Results 6041 - 6060 of 8,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by brooks
   The Sweatt v Painter decision was then a linchpin in the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision of Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Hill, Carolyn Shapiro argues that Democratic senators should try to” get behind the smokescreen” created by “the rhetoric of neutrality” by, for example, using Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
Brown, a 5-to-4 majority gave state courts great leeway in death penalty trials to remove jurors who express even mild doubt about capital punishment. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 8:22 pm by Samuel Bray
He was the Supreme Court's junior member when Roe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Ronald Mann
This is the second decision in the past month, following Wilkins v United States, reversing a lower court holding that a particular statute is jurisdictional, ruling instead that the statute is merely a “precondition to relief. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 3:20 pm
  And he noted in a Court of Appeal decision out of the Ontario Courts one case, Chang v. [read post]