Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 18,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable persons. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
American Federation of State, Municipal, and County Employees, a challenge by an Illinois child-support specialist to the fees that he is required to pay to the union that represents him, even though he does not belong to any union. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
State Engineer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
One of the most important changes came through the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:33 am
Eaton v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:23 am
M.D.F., ___ N.J. ___ (2011) (slip op. at 21-22) (quoting State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Censors should be independent, not just of the state, but of other interest groups, such as the industry itself, and yes, the child protection sector. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
(Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1172 – read judgment This application raises a significant issue about the treatment of vulnerable asylum-seekers and their children following certification of their claim as clearly unfounded. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
US v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
The affidavit of a child can occasionally be helpful to your client’s case; as the court put it in L.E.G. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:42 pm
See Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:31 pm
Heyer v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm
(Cultural Resources; Treaty Rights; Enbridge Line 5) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In re Pouget/Herrera (Indian Child Welfare Act) A+ Government Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
