Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
Holder). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:21 am
Background As I discussed in a recent post (here), in a May 8, 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:34 pm
Helpful Links Behring Regional Center LLC V. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
As the Ninth Circuit reasoned in Toyota Motor Sales v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Navajo Nation v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
A New York state appeals court on upheld the dismissal of a defamation suit targeting WPIX-TV and its reporter Magee Hickey over a 2014 story that misi [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
Holder of over a dozen United States and International patents, Dr. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
The first case of the day will be Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Focus should be on alleged infringer, not right-holder. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
It has a licensing department, and an annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars (an Optis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
In light of the Gillette principle, it would not be justified to grant the patent holder protection against products that are not novel or inventive over the prior art (an issue that was also touched upon by Arnold LJ in FibroGen v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
In short, from now on, when two registered Spanish trade marks coexist, the holder of the earlier trade mark no longer has to seek the nullity or invalidity of the later trade mark before seeking to forbid its use.Traditional doctrineHistorically, Spanish doctrine has considered that the owner of a registered Spanish trade mark had a right to use the trade mark, which didn’t yield even to the ius prohibendi of an earlier-registered Spanish trade mark. [read post]
