Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 6041 - 6060 of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nassau County Child Visitation Attorneys and Nassau County Child Custody Attorneys, among others, at Stephen Bilkis & Associates are experts in these fields of law. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Stephen Pitel, Jesse Harper, Choice of Law for Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change In 1994 the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v Jensen adopted a new and controversial choice of law rule for tort claims. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
”  Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:06 am by Susan Brenner
Upon arriving at the scene, [he] spoke with Lynbrook Police Officers, and with the complainants, Stephen Alonge and Michael Suter. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
The FDA and state and local regulatory officials traced the romaine lettuce to 23 farms and 36 fields in the Yuma growing region. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]