Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 11,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
This would bring Massachusetts in line with only California and North Dakota, the only other states that prohibit employee non-compete agreements. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
The Ninth Circuit began its analysis by stating that “[t]he relevancy bar is low,” and it faulted the district court for excluding the opinion because, even though the expert could not say that the plaintiff’s ONJ was causedby bisphosphonate therapy, he did say that the ONJ was related to bisphosphonate therapy. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:03 pm
It is probably that this bill will pass given that there is no opposition on file and is sponsored by the Trusts and Estates Section of the State Bar of California. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
This would bring Massachusetts in line with only California and North Dakota, the only other states that completely prohibit employee non-compete agreements. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:12 am
Walgreens thus failed to allege any misconduct that was unrelated to her disability, the court stated. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:03 pm
Pro-labeling groups in Vermont say they expect industry groups to go to court to stop mandatory labeling legislation enacted by the states. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
The employer, BCG and other related companies brought suit in California state court against the former employee, asserting libel, unfair competition, and intentional interference with economic advantage claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:51 pm
A California court held that a photographic array showing only one person with a birthmark, the criminal defendant was not unduly suggestive. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
A district court in California accepted Coca-Cola’s argument, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
” Odle at 11-12 (emphasis in original and stating also that “[t]he face that the California district court did not consider, much less deny, certification of the class of former employees…is a crucial distinction”). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:06 am
” The employee filed suit under California state law, including the Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:37 pm
California Clean Energy Commission v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:31 pm
The order also prohibited either parent from removing the children from this State without either a further court order or written consent of the other party. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
Likewise, some states only bar recordings of conversations that are seen as private (more on that later). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:02 am
A reinstatement petition filed on behalf of a judge who was removed from office and disbarred in Michigan failed to persuade the California State Bar Court Review Department, which has denied the request. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court during "Gay Marriage: A Civil Right?" [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
