Search for: "US v. Weekes" Results 6041 - 6060 of 39,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Provided for your review/use is this week's snapshot update of key industry news and views highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am by Rachel Sachs
University of Texas at Austin (involving the University’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions) and Shelby County v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 5:35 pm by John Parnass
A fitting way to end the week...the latest dispatch from the Great Condo Wars: Division 1's recent opinion in Ballard Residential v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
(Justia), Permanent injunction imposed on the distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software and stronger filtering software required (OUT-LAW), Ninth Circuit Holds Use in Commerce Only Creates Trademark Rights When the Use is Lawful (Intellectual Property Law Blog)Apotex Gets Out of Contempt Holding â€â [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 11:54 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Make yourself a cup of tea and catch-up on last week's IP news. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
  Back in February, the Court of Appeal in IPCom v Vodafone overturned the first instance decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell QC who held that Vodafone could benefit from what seems to be the somewhat mythical defence of Crown use. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by Margaret Wood
The architect has decided to use glass, steel, and wood rather than other materials. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
” At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude discusses Monday’s decisions and then continues last week’s discussion of Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 5:54 am by Barry Sookman
Last week an Alberta court also ruled that the connecting factors identified in the SOCAN case could be used for determining jurisdiction simpliciter in Geophysical Service Incorporated v Arcis Seismic Solutions Corp, 2015 ABQB 88. [read post]