Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its application… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:56 pm
June 26, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that in order to state a claim for securities fraud against a corporate defendant, plaintiffs may not rely upon the theory of “collective scienter,” but instead must plead a strong inference of scienter by the individual “who was responsible for the [allegedly false or misleading] statements made” by or on behalf of the… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:26 pm
Kempthorne (June 26, 2008) 2008 U.S.App.Lexis 13475, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reiterated that the appropriate way for a species to be removed from the protections of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) is via a petition for delisting. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:57 pm
We deferred submission pending our en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” The rule also states that “[i]nterest in cases arising in a court of the United States is allowed at the interest rate authorized by law. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
For instance, a decision rendered by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit could be reported at 356 F.3d 121 (9th Circ. 2004). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:36 am
June 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a board member could be liable for insider trading under the “misappropriation theory” where the board member owed no fiduciary duty to the company whose stock he traded. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reduced the punitive damage award to $2.5 million. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:48 am
Prior to his service in the United States Attorney's office, Max was an associate at David Polk & Wardwell and clerked for the Honorable Pamela Rymer, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
Request under California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:41 pm
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed on the ground that Mobile-Sierra's presumption of lawfulness never attached to the contracts since FERC had not at the outset reviewed and found the market-based prices at issue to be just and reasonable. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
§2244(b) with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:52 am
" In April, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Customs and Border Protection agency could conduct searches without reasonable suspicion. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:43 pm
Winters, in which the Ninth Circuit upheld a district court preliminary injunction of multi-national Naval exercises in the Pacific Ocean. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Const. art. 1, § 8, cl. 4 The District Court granted the United States' summary judgment motion and the debtor appealed. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit panel reversed. [read post]
