Search for: "United States and it's agents" Results 6041 - 6060 of 11,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm by John Palley
It may also designate as a person authorized to act with regard to its nationals its diplomatic or consular agents abroad insofar as the local law does not prohibit it. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:27 pm by Allison Tussey
UCB was a commercial bank headquartered in San Francisco, Calif., with branch offices throughout the United States as well as in China and Taiwan. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:51 am by Pierre Bergeron
United Airlines, Inc., a travel agent and clients sued United Airlines after the airline failed to honor tickets that had been purchased on behalf of their clients. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Provide recommendations to senior attorneys to support the development, review, and preparation of United States (US) Government-wide and IC-wide policies, procedures, guidelines, rules, and standards. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:33 pm
As the New York Times notes in the above-linked article, federal officials are permitted to use racial profiling in areas far beyond the border, as that term is understood by laypeople: Federal agents have jurisdiction to enforce immigration laws within 100 miles of the borders, including the coastlines, an area that includes roughly a third of the United States, and nearly two-thirds of its population. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 8:10 am by Steve Vladeck
 § 2241(e)(2) takes that jurisdiction away insofar as it precludes jurisdiction over “any [non-habeas] action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm by Larry
United States is a tricky classification case has to do with HTSUS Note 1 to Chapter 29, which states that "Except where the context otherwise requires, the headings of this Chapter apply only to: [certain products] with an added stabilizer (including anticaking agent) necessary for their preservation or transport. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 8:35 am by Eric Goldman
United States, should shed some light on the tensions between free expression and criminal threats on social media. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:04 am by SHG
But the Revolt of the Magistrates appeared to be harshly put down by Article III tyrants bent on making no assistant United States attorney cry. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am by Ben
If you have not published this statement at least once, you will tacitly allow the use of elements such as your photos as well as the information contained in your profile.OrPRIVACY NOTICE: Warning - any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any government including but not limited to the United States Federal Government or U.S. state legislatures who may desire to use or or be in any way involved in monitoring/using this website or any of… [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm by John Wright
”Federal Constitutional Right to Privacy: The Supreme Court of the United States has declared that the right of privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm by John Wright
” Federal Constitutional Right to Privacy: The Supreme Court of the United States has declared that the right of privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
For reasons rooted in the Supreme Court’s narrow conception of the Commerce Clause in the nineteenth century, trademark rights arise under state law – for the most part, state common law. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:10 am by David
The 2015 Edition is particularly relevant considering the significant ramifications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) repealing its existing rules, the USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility, and replacing them with the new USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:31 am by Michael DelSignore
To avoid infringing on the Supreme Court's federal constitutional law jurisdiction, the Ohio Supreme Court interpreted the state legislation on mandatory reporting broadly so as to find mandatory reporters to be agents of law enforcement. [read post]