Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
He was the first African-American accepted on the Harvard Law Review, the first to serve as a clerk on the United States Supreme Court, the first to serve in the President’s Cabinet—the second to serve in the President’s Cabinet, and the first to reach the pinnacle of the corporate bar. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
” Even “more critically,” he added, “no court should be able to order than an alien captured and detained abroad during wartime be admitted and released into the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
And this limiting principle would avoid almost the entire parade of horribles that Colorado and the United States warned about. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 7:49 am
In a death penalty case Mickens v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, in Gartner v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Sentencing Memo., United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause makes clear that the President nominates “officers of the United States,” but this nomination is subject to the Advice and Consent of the Senate. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless conduct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Kammen cites Cuyler v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
That system lasted until 2005, when the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
The Federal Circuit agreed that Congress’s choice of words – “in the Republic of Vietnam” – was ambiguous. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 2:39 pm
Judgment in the choice of [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The funds obtained through the enforcement in the relevant EU Member State shall therefore invariably be paid to the relevant State treasury in Germany. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
In most of the United States and, to some extent, the judiciary is responsible for regulation of lawyers. [read post]
