Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 44,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
Does 1-16, Interscope v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:36 am
United States, 564 U.S. 211, 222 (2011); New York v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:39 am
United States of America – United States District Court – Northern District of Oklahoma – April 1st, 2019) involves claim filed by the plaintiff for the wrongful death of her husband. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004) [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 7:11 am
United States, 2023-1970 (June 7, 2024) may have just set the course for even more. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:29 am
Iancu, which held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) arm of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) must issue a final written decision addressing each and every patent claim challenged in an Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) petition if review is granted. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
Does Wyoming’s Sex Offender Registration Act violate the United States Constitution, Art. 1, § 10, prohibition against enacting ex post facto laws? [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:41 am
Herrera v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm
The everchanging world of PAGA is full of verbose opinions, unwieldy statutory language, and a unique and sometimes perplexing vocabulary that even an exasperated United States Supreme Court expressed confusion over. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States—was its last full opinion of the October 2023 Term. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
