Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 10,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:41 am
Ed. 2d 674 (1984), for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims pursuant to the sixth amendment to the United States constitution. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:29 pm
Writing for the majority of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
There shouldn’t be uncovered states and covered states; there should be the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
United States [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
It’s like the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
