Search for: "A & A Contracting, Inc." Results 6061 - 6080 of 25,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm by Brill Legal Group
His company, DCM Erectors Inc., won contracts to work on the World Trade Center site destroyed by the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:49 am by Shahram Miri
Thus, the "persons" involved in the transaction are (1) Abel, (2) Baker and (3) Whispering Meadows, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
COMPANY ACCUSED OF RE-WRITING PRIVACY POLICY WITHOUT NOTICE TO CONSUMERSIn an administrative complaint, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged 1Health.io Inc., a/k/a Vitagene, Inc., with failing to safeguard consumers’ data and with misrepresenting their customers’ ability to get their personal information deleted from the company’s databases. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:50 am by Yukiko Kojima
 On June 5, 2013, FDOT announced a shortlist of four proposers, all of whom submitted financial proposals yesterday and technical proposals on February 12, 2014 seeking the contract to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the project. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC, NETSOLACE, INC., EDIBLE CONNECT, LLC, BERRY DIRECT, LLC, EDIBLE BRANDS, LLC, INCREDIBLE EDIBLES, LLC, and TARIQ FARID, Defendants. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm
The court said that the projections were speculative because the judge could not predict changes in future union contracts and United Airlines, Inc. future performance. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 9:00 am by Ashley S. O'Neill
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a Virginia-based consulting firm known for its lucrative government contracts business, sued former employees last year in a New Jersey district court for conspiring to steal proprietary information from the company. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
Washington, a contract entered into while a company’s charter was revoked was held to be unenforceable, and in T.K., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:20 am by Steven G. Pearl
As to unconscionability, the Court found that the delegation clause was procedurally unconscionable because it was part of a contract of adhesion. [read post]