Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 6061 - 6080 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-367); they are due Friday in Hardt v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Section 11 claims, will cost more to defend and settle: In 2018, the United States decided Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:38 am
Commissioner, No. 06-1286 (trust administration fees) CSX Transportation Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 Yet, it is important to keep in mind that such claim changes are not effective until the proceeding is concluded.This past Monday in Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (CAND), the Court considered whether cancellation/amendment  of a claim during patent reexamination mooted an otherwise justiciable dispute, explaining: Only claim 21 of United States patent number 6,665,797 is asserted in this action. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
— San Antonio 2000, no pet.), while in Kendall Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:29 pm by WIMS
"       Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]