Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 8,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:01 am
GRAHAM: And it should have an independent judiciary involved in making that decision beyond the executive branch. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In SEC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Tyrrell and Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:17 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
United States, 530 US 428 (2000). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As stated in Lavigne v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
For example, the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:20 am
Guantanamo detainees do not have rights under either of those provisions, the panel majority concluded in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Congress enacted the CRA in response to the United States Supreme Court decision, in INS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
” This might seem fairly obvious to some, as this is what people think the courts’ job would be, but in 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
In the 1968 case Pickering v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
For example, in Cohen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
In Noel Canning, Justice Breyer wrote: Finally, the Solicitor General warns that our holding may "'disrup[t] the proper balance between the coordinate branches by preventing the Executive Branch from accomplishing its constitutionally assigned functions.'" Brief for Petitioner 64 (quoting Morrison v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:31 am
Lincoln stood for constitutional supremacy, and against the prospective binding authority of the Supreme Court’s betrayal of the Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
