Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
App. 2006); Frances v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
Part V of the Child Care Act, 1991 states that in any proceedings before the Court the welfare of the child ‘must be the first and paramount consideration’ and that the Court ‘in so far as is practicable, give due consideration, having regard to his age and understanding, to the wishes of the child. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Thomasson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
See Jacob Winkelman, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:00 pm
Williams (06-694), asking whether a federal ban on pandering material believed to be child pornography is unconstitutional, and Logan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:45 am
Elrom v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
When the United States Supreme Court ruled in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Gray v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
Many family law attorneys I know have mixed feelings about the outcome of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:05 pm
That Action Transmittal discusses the procedural components required for enforcing child support obligations in compliance with the United States Supreme Court decision in Turner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:47 am
Claiming breaks in service for childcare may be excused for the purposes of member service in the NYS Employees’ Retirement SystemSoronen v Comptroller, 244 A.D.2d 842William Soronen, Jr., was a temporary aide to a New York State Senator during the 1974 and 1975 legislative sessions. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
That ruling, Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
That rule makes clear that a parent-child tie can be created by consent without any biological tie.Moreover, to the extent the marital presumption is a benefit of marriage, rather than a tight proxy for a genetic tie, it must be available to same-sex as well as different-sex couples in order to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
But he expressed little remorse for his actions and stated he enjoyed the “thrill of the hunt”: see para 9. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
Any suggestion that a state judicial officer were favoring or tending to favor one religious persuasion over another in a child[-]custody dispute would be intolerable to our organic law. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
Their first child, TC, was born in 2008 in Seattle. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:54 pm
There is a reported case called Finger v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 9:25 am
Supreme Court, in its famed Gideon v. [read post]
