Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
Hargis is consistent w/ the procedural approach: b/c registration and infringement are judged by the same standards, preclusion can apply. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an injunction binds “(A) the parties; (B) the parties’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (C) other persons who are in active concert or participation with anyone described in … [](A) or (B). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:19 am
GOI's justification for the restrictions sought to be placed on potential whistleblowers are as follows (along with my comment on their implications):Reasoning 1: Justification for Amendment of Section 4(1): "In its present formulation Section 4(1) appears to confer an absolute right on the whistleblower to make a whistleblower complaint" about:a) offences of corruption recognised under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1989, or attempts to commit such… [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Company B in turn features those characters in bracelets that infringe Company C’s marks. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:06 am
” To justify the DTSA, the release argues that (a) current federal criminal law is “insufficient,” (b) the Department of Justice “lacks the resources” to prosecute (presumably) Economic Espionage Act (“EEA”) cases, (c) state law has not stopped “interstate” theft, and (d) Federal courts would be more effective in case administration and discovery. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
The rule will likely be that all employers treated as a single employer under Section 414 of the Tax Code at subsection (b) controlled groups of corporations, subsection (c) partnerships, subsection (m) employees of an affiliated service group, or subsection (o), a sort of catch all applying to certain entities), will be treated as a single employer. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
See Public Health Service (PHS) Act §2707(b). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
The above UK based company had filed the patent application at European Patent office in February, 2011. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Further, PIC claimed that both defendants removed or altered PIC’s CMI in violation of § 1202(b) before distributing the images. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:26 am
The team is owned by an Oklahoma limited liability company known as Tulsa Pro Hoops, LLC (TPH), whose majority member is Bill Cameron, a successful banker and insurance executive. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm
Bill C-24—the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act—became the law when given Royal Assent in June 2014, but these sections were not put into effect until now. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:41 am
Silicon Valley Innovation Company, LLC, C.A. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:54 am
(B&B and ITUs really don’t fit together, do they?) [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Code § 2511(1)(c), (d). . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:57 pm
@benjaminwittes Breathless italics aside, FISA requires carrier to continue providing services with "minimum of interference" 1805(c)(2)(b) — Patrick Toomey (@PatrickCToomey) July 30, 2015 Leaving aside the question of whether italics can really be breathless, Toomey here has put his finger on an issue we had not considered. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:22 pm
(Courtesy of Center for Medical Progress) The Associated Press reports: A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
Recently, a company called Tzu Technologies, LLC began suing makers of sex toys for infringement of U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
Thuan Phong is a company that began and continues to operate in the city of Mỹ Tho, Vietnam. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
§ 227(b)(1)(C). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:28 am
Turner & Company, L.L.C. [read post]
