Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 6061 - 6080 of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Introduction: Getting pregnant Welcome to the wonderful world of making babies! [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Notably, the exclusion does not extend to family offices serving multiple families. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
Where does the urge to address nonconsequentialist interests come from? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:03 pm by Ronda Muir
" Or as Jack Welch has also said: “If there was ever a case of ‘Do as I say, not as I did,’ this is it. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:02 am by Russell Knight
What duty does each spouse have towards the other spouse’s things? [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 am by Jonathan
X is disabled) but should identify specific activity limitations that may interfere with your performance of a job. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
One does wish the Court of Appeal might manage something similar on occasion, where not wrestling with precedent. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
" While this entry does not appear excessive at first glance, the Court also discovered that an associate had billed 22.5 hours for the same task. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:19 pm
I'd say, 'You're crazy.' "Locksmiths don't have a clue what is going on. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am by Mandelman
  So, now… apparently, just weeks from the mid-terms someone does. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am by Colby Pastre
Case law and IRS regulations generally require charitable intent for a contribution to be deductible, meaning that the individual does not receive a substantial benefit from the contribution. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am by Russell Knight
” Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) Net present value = cash flow(1+i)t, where i=discount rate and t=number of time periods. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
One or even several complaints about a student's expression does not equate to substantial disruption. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
But the converse is not true--Huntsman's performance being disproportionately worse than the chemical industry in general does not, in itself, constitute an MAE. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This is an appeal of the applicant (Amazon.com) against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse its application relating to matching a given item description (e.g. of a book) with stored item definitions (e.g. in a website’s product catalog).The USPTO acting as ISA found two X documents. [read post]