Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
Aereo, Inc., in Plain English. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
”This purports to follow the guidance of the General Court in Case T-152/11 “MAD” (sadly not available in English, although referred to in the current OHIM Guidelines on Proof of Use, see page 41).What is the meaning of this??! [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Wiley: Discovery Rule Applies to Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement http://t.co/ghQOfM5nEZ -> Aereo Slammed One Last Time By Broadcasters Before SCOTUS Hearing in reply brief http://t.co/dfSmdv6WXC -> Justice Alito Rejoins Aereo Supreme Court Case http://t.co/UjpJsjh18E -> friends of the court in Google Books case http://t.co/ePshLREqru -> Permitted Exclusive Use of English Trademarks in Québec: Magasins Best Buy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Under early English feudalism, there was no need to distinguish between the monarch as a natural person and legal entity. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board v Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association, 2014 CanLII 13515 (ON LRB) [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
See, e.g., Stewart v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Telus must reimburse $2.6M in texting fees, court rules http://t.co/ib2NBzJwIE -> Ontario court forces BlackBerry executive to work out notice period http://t.co/JLPajwHvGg -> Patent Grant Numbers http://t.co/qxYZo7TZEU -> Patent Myths Corrected http://t.co/L171NcucFm -> QUEBEC COURT CONFIRMS FRENCH LANGUAGE WATCHDOG CANNOT BITE ENGLISH TRADEMARKS http://t.co/XYTYlvcvKD -> Authors Guild v Google Appeal Brief to the Second Circuit https://t.co/QhoNEtPRBw ->… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
There is still a remarkable variation in the different Courts’ approaches to quantum, from a ‘broad brush’ or ‘global’ view, to a notional percentage of rent as per English Churches v Shine. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
There is still a remarkable variation in the different Courts’ approaches to quantum, from a ‘broad brush’ or ‘global’ view, to a notional percentage of rent as per English Churches v Shine. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
This qualified authority, unlike the power often exercised in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the English Crown, is limited to the promotion of advances in the “useful arts. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
Total damages: £11,200.46 Comment Interesting to see the continued progression of Shine v English Churches as the method of assessment of quantum. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
Total damages: £11,200.46 Comment Interesting to see the continued progression of Shine v English Churches as the method of assessment of quantum. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Along with Chisholm v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The inability of a non-English speaker to understand English pops up in the legal biz a lot. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:35 pm
Part V ends the examination with Professor Tong's insights on the debate. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
This position, outlined in his work Historia Placitorum Coronæ, or The History of the Pleas of the Crown, was finally rejected in England by the House of Lords in the case of R. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Merpel doesn't get out of bed for any IPEC (né Patents County Court) judgment -- but Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 979 isn't any IPEC judgment. [read post]
