Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 6061 - 6080 of 6,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 6:29 am
" As a result, the Court ruled that "the ‘marital home' consisted entirely of personal property," and "insofar as the real property is concerned, we must presume that the evidence supports the trial court's finding that it was Husband's separate property and not a marital asset. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:08 am
The New Jersey divorce judge granted the ex-husband's motion terminate alimony. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:23 pm
Without such a hearing, the ex-husband is unable to rationally decide whether he is in a position to purchase the ex-wife's interest in the property. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Pernokis ("Husband"), pro se, appeals the trial court's division of the marital property. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 12:30 pm
Thank you to Lee Rosen at the Rosen Law Firm in North Carolina for the alert to this article on CNet's Police Blotter: What: Husband uses keystroke logger to spy on wife's suspected relationship with another woman, who sues to prevent the records from being used in the divorce case. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:05 pm
(...)At first Barrington-Coupe denied any tampering or wrongdoing with his wife's CDs. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 4:34 am
Denzik, supra, holding that a father could recover back from his former wife child support payments previously made to her because the support obligation arose from her fraudulent and years-long claim that he was the child's biological father. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
This was a huge benefit that Jane Green, Jake's ex-wife, didn't receive. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
The court said that Rhode Island would recognize the marriage and enforce the wife's right to be with her husband. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:09 am
Jonathan Banyan NASSAU COUNTYLegal ProfessionAttorney Husband Disqualified From Representing Wife in Personal Injury Action He Witnessed Smolenski v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 12:57 pm
May a man "be found guilty ... if he knew of a pending investigation and lied to his wife about his whereabouts the night of the crime, thinking that an FBI agent might decide to invterview her and that she might in turn be influenced in her statement to the agent by her husband's false account of his whereabouts"? [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
I guess you don't lose your sense of humor -- as it were -- just because you recently set your wife on fire. [read post]