Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 6061 - 6080 of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 12:40 pm by Diego Zambrano
If it does not, courts can and should discard it. . . . [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Craig Whitney
  That public performance right, codified in the 1976 Copyright Act, includes (1) any performance at a place open to the public or any gathering with a substantial number of people outside the “normal circle of family and social acquaintances,” and (2) the transmission of a performance to the public whether or not those members of the public receive it in the same location and at the same time. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:42 am by David Lat
”In fairness to this latest complainant, she bases her claim on a little more than just the facts that (1) her husband is a sex addict and (2) Justice Douglas is a sex goddess. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:46 am by Eugene Volokh
And Cutter also doesn't explain what is to be done when element 1 is present—the exemption does lift an exceptional government-created burden on religious exercise—but element 2 is not, because the exemption lifts the burden on religion without taking into account the burden that the lifting imposes on third parties. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
The only relief she granted Poole was on his claim for an accounting, which the court found was authorized by NYLPA § 99(1)(b). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Insured Exclusion precluded from coverage any Claim:   brought by or on behalf of , or in the name or right of … any Insured Person, unless such Claim is: (1) brought and maintained independently of, and without the solicitation, assistance or active participation of, the Insured Organization or any Insured Person, (2) brought or maintained by an Insured Person for contribution or indemnity and directly results from another Claim covered under this Policy, or… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am by Kari Hong
Lee Gelernt, representing Thuraissigiam, began his challenge to the expedited removal process by making three points: (1) the main problem with expedited review is that it removes the judiciary from any role in the process; (2) the government has provided no limitation as to when it applies expedited removal, which means that nothing would prevent mass deportations from the interior; and (3) the Supreme Court has used habeas review even when legal error was involved in… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
But the two Justices who filed a separate "statement," John Paul Stevens and Anthony M. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:33 am
So if John Doe robs a liquor store, he's the principal (and the only principal) in that crime. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:49 am
POSITION SIZING is when the investor purchases shares or bonds in a way that the purchased position represents (1) a predetermined dollar size, or (2) a predetermined percentage size of the overall portfolio or (3) a predetermined percentage size of an asset category. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
So why does the Court in Perez mandate in the geographic realm what it forbids in the linguistic realm? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
John Schmid of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that despite efforts to improve, U.S. patent approvals are moving slower. [read post]