Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 6061 - 6080 of 35,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2022, 8:45 am by Amy L. Peck
More than one million students come to the United States each year on F-1 student visas. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 94186 (SD NY, July 14, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of an inmate's complaint that Muslims in his housing unit were not called for Friday Jummah services for two consecutive weeks.In Turner v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am by Vikram David Amar
Last week, a venerable three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a well-intentioned but analytically confounding ruling in a highly contentious dispute between the federal government and the State of Missouri. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
In NMCCA's en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:31 pm by Scott McKeown
Legislative Fix Enacted for Trademarks On March 1st, the Supreme Court will hear its fifth PTAB related case in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:49 am by Gene Quinn
Recently,  the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Clark (9th Cir.1990), overruled on other grounds by United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Will Baude
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
LEXIS 16802 (WD WA, March 8, 2007), a Washington federal Magistrate Judge gave a prisoner challenging the adequacy of the kosher diet furnished to him in prison an opportunity to amend his complaint to adequately state a First Amendment and RLUIPA claim.In Jamal v. [read post]