Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 6,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
Milliman USA, Inc., 105 Conn. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Domain Name Law White hat domainers are not black hat cybersquatters. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
In Elie v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 11:11 pm
In 2005, the Congressional Research Service published a characteristically helpful summary of the material witness statute: "Arrest and Detention of Material Witnesses:Federal Law In Brief and Section 12 of the USA PATRIOT and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act (H.R. 3199). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
In their August 6, 2009 Chicago superseding indictment filed in USA v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:29 am
By Eric Goldman Maypark v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
In O’Brien v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:12 am
F. of L. files antitrust suit against Merck, alleging fraudulent procurement of a patent, improper listing of patent in Orange Book (Patent Docs) Singulair (Montelukast) – US: Merck get injunction preventing Teva from selling generic Montelukast: Merck Sharp & Dohme Pharmaceuticals SRL v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA (The IP Factor) (IP Watchdog) (SmartBrief) (SmartBrief) (GenericsWeb) [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
(Luxembourg: 0646; USA: 7731) (the "Non-U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:36 am
See Deposition of President of MediaSentry in BMG v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
/**/ by James Kachmar In Cristoff v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:52 am
USA, Inc. et al., 3-07-cv-01596 (NJD August 19, 2009, Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law) (Brown, J.) [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
This is why, under the UK, USA, EP etc. laws, patented products which are first sold under the compulsory licenses, the principle of exhaustion has been held inapplicable as the voluntary consent of the patentee is lacking. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:28 pm
In recent years changes to electronic technology and the law (Section 248D Corporations Act) have allowed directors to attend board meetings by telephone, video conferencing or over the internet. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
