Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 6061 - 6080 of 29,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 7:38 pm
  Officially know as the United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions, this publication is compiled every four years, following the Presidential election. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am by Marcel Pemsel
Such an interpretation of Väderstad’s limitation was possible only because Väderstad merely cancelled terms but did not alter existing ones. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Marc Climaco
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:20 am by Andrew Hamm
In another of the Supreme Court’s major cases scheduled for next term, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because we conclude that this relationship did not violate the arbitration agreement or rise to the level of evident partiality, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment. 08a0011p.06 USA v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:11 pm
Tags: Affirmative Action, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:17 pm
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
In so holding, the Fifth Circuit relied heavily on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S602aCriminal law -- Conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and powder cocaine -- Sentencing -- Federal guidelines -- Offense level -- Quantity of drugs -- Circuit court of appeals' order requiring petitioners' resentencing based on the district courts' categorical rejection of the 100:1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio and substitution of its own 20:1 ratio conflicts with Kimbrough v. [read post]