Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6061 - 6080 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 4:39 am by Will Newman
His reasoning why she should be liable was that she did not make her building safe enough given her son’s violent nature. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:06 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The plaintiff applied for and received benefits from the staffing company’s workers’ compensation insurer for the injuries incurred while working at the defendants facility. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:48 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Like other types of negligence claims, a Massachusetts premises liability claim requires victim show defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty and that the breach resulted in plaintiff’s compensable injuries. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
Section 1109 generally makes a fiduciary of a plan personally liable to the plan for any losses resulting from his or her breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:34 am by Mark Ashton
Jennifer Crumley has been found criminally liable for Ethan’s conduct. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:43 am
The only claim the court did not dismiss was an allegation that the defendants had engaged in waste by approving a multimillion dollar payment and benefit package for Citigroup's former CEO upon his retirement. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
At trial, the jury found the drywall manufacturer and two other defendants liable, including a glass company and a former employer of the plaintiff. 75% liability was allocated to the manufacturer. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
The Defendant, JGC, described as a very substantial Spanish producer of wines and other beverages, had previously been found liable for trade mark infringement in relation to its cava marketed and sold under the name "Cristalino" (see previous IPKat post here). [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendants bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendants bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendants bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:21 pm
A patient's unreasonable failure to follow the defendant's medical advice can be contributory negligence sufficient to bar recovery. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm by Robert J. McKennon
  When an insurance company refuses to defend, those insurers which do contribute to the defense may seek contribution from the insurer(s) that do not. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Starting in July, 2013, Defendants made several posts about their soon-to-be-launched Bitcoin mining computer (the aforementioned `Baby Jet’), and further posted, on August 5th and August 8, 2013, that they would begin shipping the product in October, 2013. . . .On August 10, 2013, [Morici] visited Defendants' website and decided he wanted to purchase a `Baby Jet’ after viewing the computer's technical specifications. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
It could not, however, find that Defendant has satisfied its burden of proof, as Defendant has made no effort to rebut her testimony and thereby seriously call into question the presumption that Plaintiff was reasonably diligent. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The city defended against the lawsuit by claiming that it could not be held liable under the recreational use statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:34 am by Miller & Falkner
At the trial, the aunt defended the case by arguing that she had no reason to think that her dog would attack Jason. [read post]