Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2019, 7:48 am
The employer defended the grant of summary judgment on the ground addressed by the lower court and on one the court did not reach: whether the company knew about the harassment and failed to take remedial action. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
The plaintiff asked the trial court to hold that the defendant was liable as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
The plaintiff asked the trial court to hold that the defendant was liable as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
For these and other reasons, EFF has called on cryptocurrency exchanges to adopt best practices around defending user rights, including issuing regular transparency reports. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:34 pm
Generally, for a defendant to be liable under a dram shop statute, the plaintiff must prove that the bar continued to serve alcohol to an obviously drunk person. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
(The Lanham Act should be triggered where there is false advertising that changes consumer behavior—if the plaintiff’s product was exactly the same as the defendant’s and exactly the same price and there was nothing better on the market, a misrepresentation of superiority that diverted purchasers to the defendant wouldn’t necessarily harm those purchasers in a tangible way, setting aside the moral disrespect of fraud, but it distorts… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:14 am
Spokane Transit Auth., the Washington Supreme Court established that in order to make a prima facie case of discrimination under RCW 49.60.215, a plaintiff must prove that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the defendant’s establishment is a place of public accommodation, (3) the defendant discriminated against the plaintiff when it did not treat the plaintiff in a manner comparable to the treatment it provides to persons outside the class, and… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
In response to the plaintiff’s claim, the defendant argued that the uneven sidewalk was an open and obvious hazard and that the plaintiff’s case should be dismissed. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:30 am
However, the court agreed with the plaintiff’s reasoning regarding the defendant’s duty to repair the sidewalk. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 10:34 am
Additionally, an employer will not be liable for failing to reimburse an employee for expenses that exceed the expenditure limits contained in the employer’s policy (“so long as the employer does not institute a policy that provides for no reimbursement or de minimis reimbursement. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 5:16 am
The Court rejected that Pennsylvania courts would hold a defendant liable under subsection (a)(30) for offers to sell, mere preparation, or a buyer’s solicitation. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:14 am
The Court joined other Circuits (citing the Seventh and Tenth) and held that a defendant cannot be criminally liable for conspiring with a government informant. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Blacklock’s Reporter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
” Liability is imposed only if the defendant knew or should have known about the other employer’s conduct and “failed to undertake prompt corrective measures within its control” (the negligence standard). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:03 pm
In the case, the defendant caused a multi-car accident when she failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with the plaintiff’s vehicle. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
“Despite the massive toll from the Valentine’s Day massacre in Parkland – 14 students and three teachers dead, 17 students injured, and scores more suffering post-traumatic shock – the School Board has warned everyone that if it’s found liable, there’ll be only $300,000 for them to share. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
“Despite the massive toll from the Valentine’s Day massacre in Parkland – 14 students and three teachers dead, 17 students injured, and scores more suffering post-traumatic shock – the School Board has warned everyone that if it’s found liable, there’ll be only $300,000 for them to share. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Quigley v City of Auburn, 267 AD2d 978, the court observed that "It is well settled that such actions by a civilian complainant . . . do not render the complainant liable for . . . malicious prosecution. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 10:14 am
Of course, this case did not involve the defendant’s grandson. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Should courts also consider how much similarity exists between the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s products, processes, or services? [read post]
