Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 6061 - 6080 of 6,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
Read the Republican lawmakers' brief here: U S v Farley Amicus Brief.pdf [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:51 pm
Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
===*Sara Burd-Sharpes, Kirsten Lewis and Eduardo Borges Martin (2008). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:19 am
In addition to UBS, defendants in the class action case include Marcel Ospel, Phillip Lofts, Peter Wuffli, Mark Branson, Peter Kurer, Martin Liechti, Peter Kurer, and Raoul Weil. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
Reardon, partners at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, discuss three of the Court's recent decisions: in Helmsley-Spear Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:07 am by Pauline H. Tesler
She has been peer-rated "A-V" by Martindale-Hubbell since the early 1980's and was elected a fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers in 1984. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:09 am
[www.oranous.com]IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDACASE NO. 84-CF-010538 STATE OF FLORIDA,Plaintiff,v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
Consider, for example, Thomas' view of the Commerce Clause that led to his concurring opinion in United States v Lopez. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50154(U), Decided on February 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Kings County, Justice Martin Schneier [not officially reported]Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his postion effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
It must be approved by the state legislature, where some are raising questions.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
  See Martin v Cincinnati Gas & Elec.Co., No. 07-6485, 2009 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
  See Martin v Cincinnati Gas & Elec.Co., No. 07-6485, 2009 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
  See Martin v Cincinnati Gas & Elec.Co., No. 07-6485, 2009 U.S. [read post]