Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 6061 - 6080 of 57,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am
Namely because of the increase of chances of more than one person becoming injured as a result. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am
Namely because of the increase of chances of more than one person becoming injured as a result. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:43 am by Phil Dixon
App. 328 (2005) (finding a fatal defect where the indictment alleged possession of a schedule I substance but did not accurately name any schedule I substance). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:16 am by Florian Mueller
Seungho Ahn, appeared to have a hand in a patent infringement action brought by a non-practicing entity named Staton Techiya against Samsung in the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(A "protective order," as the motion suggests, would keep the defendant and defendant's counsel from publicizing the names of the witnesses, but only until their testimony is used at trial or in a filing, such as a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
Williamson of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas denied various Preliminary Objections and a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Defendants.The court held that the Plaintiff’s Complaint which alleged the dates of care, the places that the care was completed, identified several Defendant medical providers by name and also alleged that certain agents of the Defendant hospital and medical group were unknown to Plaintiff but known to Defendant, possessed… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am by Josh Blackman
When two judges on the same court share the last name, it is common to use the Judges' first names. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Organization for Transformative Works, Rebecca Tushnet: The Organization for Transformative Works (“OTW”) is a nonprofit established to protect and defend fans and fanworks from commercial exploitation and legal challenge. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
The district court directed a verdict for the defendants, but the Seventh Circuit reversed. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Conn.), also held that the defendant’s company name, “Liberty Casket,” and the iconography of the Statue of Liberty and the American flag “evoke clear associations with the United States of America,” but were “too general to evoke any specific geographical associations or to support an inference that there is an implied claim of domestic manufacture. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Common law breach of express warranty under the laws of named plaintiffs’ respective states: The number of cups was plausibly an express warranty. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
At the moment, the tort continues to be invoked alongside data breach claims in a “catch all” approach by claimants (as, for example, in Darren Lee Warren v DSG Retail Limited,[19] where the court held that the claimant’s attempt to claim for misuse of private information failed because there was no positive action to indicate interference by the defendant). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, they asked the defendant to waive service of the case, which he refused to do. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:07 am by Arfaa Law Group
The court explained that a party named as a defendant in a state civil lawsuit can remove the matter to federal court but only if the federal court can exercise jurisdiction over one or more of the claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
The court in Verdone declared that the limited partnership automatically dissolved under the express terms of the partnership agreement when the sole general partner resigned and purported to name an LLC controlled by one of her four children — each of whom was a limited partner — as the new Managing General Partner. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The defendant declined to take part in any of the proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 11:48 am by INFORRM
If a complainant refuses a big offer and insists on a trial the courts may then make the complainant pay the defendant’s trial costs. [read post]