Search for: "Personality Productions, Inc."
Results 6061 - 6080
of 12,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
™ tools, products, training and other resources here and reading some of our other Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
In Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech Inc[2014] EWHC 1094 (Pat), noted by the IPKat here, Birss J had to deal with inventive step of an ‘incremental’ invention, and he found the inventive concept, which related to a dosage regimen, to be obvious. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:44 pm
One ill person was hospitalized. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:23 pm
A complete listing of all of the recalled products is available on the FDA website. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 3:51 pm
Consumers unaware of the recall could continue to eat the products and potentially get sick. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:02 pm
Schwan’s Home Serv., Inc., the California Court of Appeals held that “employees who were required to use personal cell phones for business purposes suffered an expenditure or loss which required reimbursement”. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:02 pm
Schwan’s Home Serv., Inc., the California Court of Appeals held that “employees who were required to use personal cell phones for business purposes suffered an expenditure or loss which required reimbursement”. [read post]
DRS Technical Services, Inc. To Pay a Settlement of $13.7 Million to U.S. Government for Overbilling
17 Oct 2014, 2:36 pm
Battery, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. 13-1424Issue: Whether, in enacting the Clean Water Act, Congress intended to strip the states of the ability to punish harm to their wildlife resulting from oil spills. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., No. 3:12 oe 40001, 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
Anyone questioning whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
And while the employee contended that he was not allowed to conduct discovery, he had the right to request a subpoena to compel testimony of witnesses and production of documentary evidence if necessary. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
California has a statutory right of publicity, as §3344 ofCalifornia’s civil Code forbids knowingly using another person’s “name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods or services” without consent. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Registration is $300 per person. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., 2014 WL 905419 (S.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
Sometimes you can tell from past posts of mine that I do personally agree with that position, but you should not draw such an inference simply from the filing of the brief.) * * * SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT People often use the names of organizations, celebrities, and trademarked products, to comment on them, critique them, parody them, review their work, and more. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Colt Energy, Inc., 2013 WL 6016231 (D. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 11:08 pm
Beckwith, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
One mark per product: sub-product lines are important in practice.Farley: this isn’t really a paper about TM proliferation. [read post]
