Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 7,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 10:43 pm
In today’s case (Peters v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:19 am
For those interested in the topic, I highly recommend a 2015 article in The Business Lawyer by Peter B. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
Peter S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
That ruling, in a case known as Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
That ruling, in a case known as Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
” See Schaeffler v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation – Deadlock broken on… [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Oakley Capital, whose founder and managing partner is the reportedly significant British Conservative Party donor, Peter Dubens, at least for a while, has acquired majority ownership of v-Lex, as the latter continues to innovate and embed itself in markets. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
Clark v Werden Peter Clark, James Werden and John Muller were once business associates, but Clark and Werden had a falling out. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[v] Elkin Abramowitz and Peter Scher, The Hyde Amendment: Congress Creates a Toehold for Wrongful Prosecution, 22 Champion 22 (1998). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
– Global Gaming Co’s acquisition of The Pirate Bay (IP finance) New Pirate Bay bosses to compensate rights owners (Managing Intellectual Property) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Online gambling patent: proof of suitability and intention to put an invention into effect: Cranway Ltd v Playtech Ltd & Ors (PatLit) Digital Britain: The UK government’s vision for a 21st century digital economy (Filewrapper) The devil’s in the digital… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Peter Odell Campbell, Univ of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: The Procedural Queer: Substantive Due Process, Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
” (Schenk v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
In R. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
: Ex parte Godwin (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Software should be patentable (Patent Fools) (PLI) (PLI) Software method claims: Bilski in light of Benson (Patently-O) [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm
Congratulations to Peter D. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am
It happened to be the lower court’s ruling in Shapiro v Ettison, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670 [U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am
” Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of Murr v. [read post]
