Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 6061 - 6080 of 6,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
” Thus, a trademark owner may only seek redress if another’s use of a registered mark on a different set of goods and services is likely to cause confusion with the owner’s use of the mark in connection with its registered goods.The Ninth Circuit reiterated its holding in Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:03 am
SCOTUSBlog sums up the issue here, noting that the government recommended granting cert in the case of “MetLife v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:00 am
  Judge McConnell reiterated the point, noting that "surely" executives "were entitled to some guidance. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
In HLB Kidsons (A Firm) v Lloyds Underwriters & Others [2007] EWCH 2699, a dispute arose over whether the claimant firm of accountants had properly notified claims to the defendant insurers. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
 Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
 Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Tidewater relies on the same authority and reiterates the same legal arguments as it did both before the bankruptcy court and on appeal to the BAP. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
Ruling unanimously on December 11, a panel of the Court of Appeals of Minnesota held in P.G.M. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:15 am
Many of you may be aware of the Mikaloff decision in a federal court in northern Ohio, where the judge said residency restrictions are punishment and cannot be applied retroactively… [regarding the Hyle v. [read post]