Search for: "Reynolds Reynolds" Results 6061 - 6080 of 6,444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:15 pm by Bradley Coxe
      In a recent article discussing the Amendment, respected legal scholar and professor of family law at Wake Forest University Suzanne Reynolds wrote the following:     Unlike other law protecting us from criminal conduct, domestic violence law requires that the victim and batterer have a “personal relationship. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:42 pm by Rick
Mike Reynolds and his ilk would have you believe that, Proposition 36 will release dangerous criminals from prison who were sentenced to life terms because of their long criminal history. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm by Ron Coleman
 As Glenn Reynolds writes, THEY DON’T CALL IT THE “STUPID PARTY” FOR NOTHING:  Republican Study Committee Disowns Intellectual Property Paper. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm by Helen Alvare
  A few examples make the point: In the case refusing to allow polygamy on the grounds of the Free Exercise Clause, Reynolds v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 7:48 am
" The word "rube" denotes a dumb rural character, but McCain uses it not for it's actual meaning, but because he's noticed there's a way that Glenn Reynolds uses it, and he seems to imagine that using Glenn's word will bring Glenn in on his team. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:31 am by Will Newman
I particularly prefer the Common Law library (such as Bullen & Leake & Jacob's Precedents of Pleadings, Goff & Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment, Jackson & Powell on Professional Liability, Benjamin's Sale of Goods, Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, Charlesworth & Percy on Negligence and Clerk & Lindsell on Torts) but also Sweet & Maxwell text books especially Palmer’s Company law. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
I am a Presbyterian and a believer in the Platonic ideal that knowledge precedes and should foster action, so I am praying that this explanation can move us beyond religious polarization and back to a more humane religious liberty and society.The principle that needs to be understood is simple and profound: under the United States Constitution, religious liberty is the absolute right to believe anything, the right to speak publicly about your religion without government censorship, but when it… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:23 am by GSU Law Student
Past honorees of the IMAGE Film Award Gala include Cicely Tyson, Spike Lee, Burt Reynolds, Ozzie Davis and Ruby Dee. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:41 am by Randazza
UPDATE: Just by happenstance, Glenn Reynolds has a parallel article talking about lobbyists, with a few less cuss words. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The legal context On the issue of the legal setting for the work of IPSO; we also know from the seminal speeches of the House of Lords in the ground breaking 1999 Reynolds case which created the Public Interest defence which is the origin of section 4 of the 2013 Defamation Act that there is no public interest in the dissemination of misinformation. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm by Rachit Buch
TNL sought to use this information in its libel defence of justification, or truth, but was also running a Reynolds defence of qualified privilege. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6241, for Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
There being no contention that Oregon's drug law represents an attempt to regulate religious beliefs, the communication of religious beliefs, or the raising of one's children in those beliefs, the rule to which we have adhered ever since Reynolds plainly controls. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:35 am by SHG
  Perhaps nothing that exists has better demonstrated the verity of Sir Joshua Reynolds' quote. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm by Diane Marie Amann
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., the Court held that in disputes involving “ordinary contracts,” courts decide substantive issues of “arbitrability,” while “procedural matters” are presumptively left to arbitrators. [read post]