Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 6061 - 6080 of 14,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 9:18 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
Furthermore, the Appellate Division directed the family court on remand to address any state-law based relief and “[w]hen making that determination, the court should apply New Jersey law as it would in any other case of that type. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm by Josh Blackman
S., at 187 (finding it "perfectly clear" that the President could "establish a naval blockade" to prevent illegal migrants from entering theUnited States); see also Abourezk v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:49 am
Krug, Multilateral convergence of investment company regulation Julien Chaisse, Greek debt restructuring, Abaclat v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2016).Luke W. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:28 am
It's up to the Member States to determine, for their respective territories, the geographical indications which they want to protect.* Community protection of geographical indications is based on the geographical indications as determined by laws of the Member States in compliance with the relevant provisions of Community law. [read post]