Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
A. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
See Cuyler v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
Cite to Brittain v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The Appeals Court said the Federal government saw this as a threat to its power to regulate commercial shipping on Buzzards Bay and sued to abrogate certain provisions of the MOSPA. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
State, 2009-Ohio-3178. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:26 am
Nevertheless, the power of the wall metaphor endures. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:33 pm
A state has broad power to make classifications and, while it may not draw a line which constitutes an invidious discrimination, the test in the end is whether the line drawn is a rational one as in Levy v Louisisana. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:32 pm
Each State and Territory purchasing authority acquires these products for supply to publicly funded health facilities, including public hospitals. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:58 am
State legislators across the country have passed bills that give them power to reject the will of voters. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
Child Poverty Action Group, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 1058 This is a benefits case rather than housing per se, but it concerns an important point which will affect many. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:49 pm
In Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
This effects a federally-imposed restructuring of power within state government.... [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
But as our brief explains, after Barr v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:15 am
II powers, the United States Supreme Court found, for the first time, that the design of an administrative agency was unconstitutional even though Congress had not inappropriately inserted itself into the appointments or removal processes for the agency’s head or into the substance of agency policymaking by retaining a congressional veto power over the agency’s actions. [read post]
