Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 41,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
§ 946a (2018), report for FY18 states (at 9) that “[o]f the 502 cases in which findings were entered in FY18, 246 of them, or 51 percent, included sexual misconduct related offenses (Articles 120, 120b, and 120c). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
Tam, the Board struck down the "disparagement" provision and in Ianco v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
DorfOn Wednesday of last week, SCOTUS heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
The Data Act requires Member States to designate one or more enforcement authorities and to lay down penalties for violations of the Act, although the draft Regulation clarifies that the designation of an authority will not impinge the powers granted under the GDPR to national data protection authorities in relation to personal data. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:39 pm
To illustrate this point, imagine a scenario where a non-super power, a state with an average size military and without a permanent seat on the Security Council, invaded a neighboring country. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
Moreover, they add, in its 2011 decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 5:00 pm
A draft of the Amars' article is here and below (with the Amars' permission) is a taste of their powerful analysis.The Court’s rulings in Bush v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm
Wade v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
Selistö v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
Standardized book publishing contracts are powerful negotiation tools. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
Standardized book publishing contracts are powerful negotiation tools. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Esposti and her coauthors compared 23 states that have enacted such laws, known as stand your ground laws, with 18 states that do not have stand your ground laws. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm
See Cheek v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm
The context for this dispute flows out of the earlier (and un-appealed) CIT decision in Energizer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm
A lot of litigation power is being spent on whether or not the plaintiff’s choice of judge (Judge Albright) will stick. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
’” Time, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am
She noted that this is a “common fact pattern” and is consistent with the facts underlying the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
