Search for: "Samsung" Results 6061 - 6080 of 6,722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 6:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Exhaustion Doctrine According to the Opinion, the ITC rejected the Respondents’ arguments that products using licensed memory sold by non-respondent Samsung should be exempt from any exclusion order. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:39 am by Kelly
Cingular Wireless (Patently-O) CAFC: Inconsistent characterisation (and partial disclosure) of disputed prior art may lead to inequitable conduct: Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc v emsChart, Inc (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (IPBiz) CAFC: No joint infringement despite strategic partnership, joint distribution agreement and packages sales: Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc v emsChart, Inc (Patently-O) (The Point of Novelty) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – A patent a… [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:32 pm by Raymond Millien
  Between 2004-2009, the top five NPE targets were Apple (56 law suits), Sony (55), Dell (50), Microsoft (49) and HP / Samsung (48). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:19 am by blaisemouttet
This patent from Samsung teaches a ferromagnetic nanoparticle ink to circumvent these problems. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint asserts that the Samsung chips at issue include some of Samsung’s most recent generations of flash memory chips, namely Samsung’s 35, 42, 51, and 65 nanometer NAND Flash Memory Technology Node devices. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm by WIMS
.; Premier Farnell; Resource Media; Samsung; Sprout Creation; Stokes Lawrence; and Wells Fargo. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In Order No. 46, ALJ Gildea denied Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:53 am by Phil
Samsung filed a case with the ITC in 2009 listing Spansion and several other firms. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Wham-O, Inc (Docket Report) ITC issues public version of opinion determining not to revise LEO and not to issue CDO in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear and Advanced Analogic (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – NetPak terminated from Investigation 337-TA-718 Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof based on consent order (ITC 337 Update) GreenShift –… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:05 pm by Joe Mullin
The suit, against Apple, Sprint, Samsung, and Verizon, alleges that various smartphones made by those companies have false patent marks. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:40 am
This came in the heels of the sponsorship agreement of July 17th between Dow Chemical and the IOC.At least with respect to the 2012 Olympics, which will take place in London, in addition to Dow Chemicals and P&G, the sponsors are Coca-Cola, Acer, Atros Origin (I think that they mean the IT company Atos Origin), General Electric, McDonald's, Omega, Panasonic, Samsung and Visa. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:05 pm by Sean Hayes
Protecting Trade Secrets in Korea: Top 5 Things to Know Before Subjecting your Business Secrets to the Korean Market Samsung Investigated for Union Busting by Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor Finding a Korean Distributor: Top 10 Things to Know Before you Jump into Bed with an Agent in Korea Fines by the Korea Fair Trade Commission Increases for Abuse of Market Position and Unfair Trade Practices in Korea Korean Currency Control Laws Revised: Korea Won – Yuan The post Korean… [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 10:51 am by Gene Quinn
As a result, large companies are getting sued every week, and recently Americans for Fair Patent Use sued Apple, Sprint, Verizon and Samsung in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that the companies are selling products that have expired patent numbers on them, making them the latest high profile targets of this new false marking patent troll. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
Google (EDTexweblog.com) ITC issues notice of no violation in encapsulated circuit device investigation based on complaint by Amkor against Carsem (ITC 337 Update) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kodak – Commission issues notice of determination to review ID in 337-TA-703 Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras and Components Thereof involving Apple and RIM as respondents (ITC 337 Update) (ITC Law Blog) Microsoft – Bilski to… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:14 pm by blaisemouttet
This patent from Samsung teaches how surface-modified carbon nanotubes can be used to alleviate this problem. [read post]