Search for: "Smith v. SMITH"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 16,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 3:15 pm
Ten months earlier Judge Hamilton had summarily dismissed Tucker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
The use of generic cell phone tower data appears very similar to the pen register used in Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
Read the full opinion here: Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:46 pm
Perry v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:50 am
In Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
The defendant in this case, State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 6:33 am
In this case (Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Banton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:32 am
Here is the Abstract:Smith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, testimony was heard from the following witnesses: Brenda V. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
USA Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:57 am
15 Jan 2019, 6:05 am
This week, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:41 am
Arizona and the SG, and some of the other supporting amici as well, raise once more the supposed multi-witness problem – i.e., the idea that if the Confrontation Clause is deemed to require that an analyst in the position of Rast testify subject to confrontation then there will often have to be a parade of lab witnesses. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
Defendant could not suppress seizure of his telephone records from the telephone company under Smith v. [read post]
