Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 26,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
In Palko v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
As Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote: “The Court today holds that Indian country within a State’s territory is part of a State, not separate from a State,” reasoning that “as a matter of state sovereignty, a State has jurisdiction over all of its territory, including Indian country. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:24 pm
(Europe) Ltd v Inter-Zuid Transport BV (case C452/12). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
In Mezerhane v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:02 am
Tamayo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
CIting Glos v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court ruled that the eastern half of Oklahoma remains “Indian country” for purposes of the Major Crimes Act, meaning that the federal government, not the state, has authority for prosecuting Native Americans for major crimes committed on reservations. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:46 am
INS, 296 F.3d 316 (4th Cir.2002) (asylum proceeding); United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
Also a conclusion that a patent is infringed or not infringed involves in this country a decision on validity as in this country no man can infringe an invalid patent. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States and EEOC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:45 am
In the previous post on this topic, we had discussed a portion of the landmark case of Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:54 am
Rhonda V. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
Under the Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued its eagerly awaited ruling in Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:50 am
Pursuant to this statute, the requesting government is able to admit into evidence any document whatsoever through the simple device of annexing the document to a certification by the principal diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in that country. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:23 pm
” Opati v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:09 pm
Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 6:33 am
Justice Breyer's dissent in Medellin v. [read post]
