Search for: "State v. Dollar" Results 6061 - 6080 of 9,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm by Kevin
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 2:36 pm
Better than on the field of battle, I'd think.Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 8:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Soon after, GOLDSTEIN flew from Hong Kong to Dulles International Airport carrying a duffel bag containing approximately $968,000 in United States dollars. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Media companies that fail to comply face a fine of up to a 1 million Singapore dollars (about $722,000). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
A missing apostrophe in a Facebook post could cost real estate agent Anthony Zadravic thousands of dollars after a court ruled a defamation case against him could proceed. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Several Election Deniers Backed by Trump Prevail in Hotly Contested Primaries MSN – Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2022 Several election deniers backed by former President Trump prevailed in closely watched primaries on August 2, as a nationwide battle over the future of the GOP played out in state and federal races across five states. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]