Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 9,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
The trial court, which is to say the United States District Court in Manhattan agreed with Ms. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am
” (Cairns v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
District Court (S.D.N.Y.)Docket: Windsor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
§ 3162(a)(2); United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
The Court relisted for the first time in Lanus v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court first agreed with the Fifth Circuit that the University demonstrated its admissions policy served a compelling state interest. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:49 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bremen v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
A funny thing happened between the Supreme Court’s 2009 opinion in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:12 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:41 pm
But Ilya and Justice Alito both beg the central question of federalizing land-use law by using state courts as a model for federal judicial behavior. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
He had a healthy dose of it when he was first on the court. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
The last section of the Court’s opinion is the judicial version of throwing the Voting Rights Act ball back across First Street N.E. to Congress. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
” The District Court dismissed the case on grounds that there was no antitrust violation. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
” The District Court dismissed the case on grounds that there was no antitrust violation. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
” The District Court dismissed the case on grounds that there was no antitrust violation. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
During that time, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
